No - because the Kingsley families could just stay at Kingsley and get TWI programming but they could elect to opt out and yeah, would have to travel to the new school.
Yeah, the board spent a lot of time talking about a "50 year plan" at the meeting on Monday but they've shared no such thing with the community. There is definitely an abs…
No - because the Kingsley families could just stay at Kingsley and get TWI programming but they could elect to opt out and yeah, would have to travel to the new school.
Yeah, the board spent a lot of time talking about a "50 year plan" at the meeting on Monday but they've shared no such thing with the community. There is definitely an absence of long-term planning and I think we should demand the board show their thinking.
It's just not clear to me what other options we have right now. This is a pretty bananas sunk cost to just write off..
Especially since 50 years from now you'd be looking at the end of the useful life of the building. Between modern construction and the inevitable deferred maintenance new schools only last 50 - 60 years
No - because the Kingsley families could just stay at Kingsley and get TWI programming but they could elect to opt out and yeah, would have to travel to the new school.
Yeah, the board spent a lot of time talking about a "50 year plan" at the meeting on Monday but they've shared no such thing with the community. There is definitely an absence of long-term planning and I think we should demand the board show their thinking.
It's just not clear to me what other options we have right now. This is a pretty bananas sunk cost to just write off..
These humans don’t even have joint goals --including literacy goals --with ETHS. Mention of a “50 year plan” was hilarious.
Especially since 50 years from now you'd be looking at the end of the useful life of the building. Between modern construction and the inevitable deferred maintenance new schools only last 50 - 60 years