It looks like BS as usual with those "new" re-image positions. I do not see how the district is saving any money with all these new job postings! The district needs to close out the Deputy Superintendent's position which is costing the district over $200K per year. The population/ enrollment cannot justify having this position.
It looks like BS as usual with those "new" re-image positions. I do not see how the district is saving any money with all these new job postings! The district needs to close out the Deputy Superintendent's position which is costing the district over $200K per year. The population/ enrollment cannot justify having this position.
I couldn't agree more. It is a disgrace that the district is keeping this position. I have neither seen nor heard any updates from the Deputy Superintendent in months. What does this role do exactly?
Tom - is this something worth looking into? It is a lot of money and I'm not sure what the benefit of keeping this position is.
It looks like BS as usual with those "new" re-image positions. I do not see how the district is saving any money with all these new job postings! The district needs to close out the Deputy Superintendent's position which is costing the district over $200K per year. The population/ enrollment cannot justify having this position.
I couldn't agree more. It is a disgrace that the district is keeping this position. I have neither seen nor heard any updates from the Deputy Superintendent in months. What does this role do exactly?
Tom - is this something worth looking into? It is a lot of money and I'm not sure what the benefit of keeping this position is.
-Concerned Citizen