Response To Dr Horton Q And A In

Last night, Dr. Horton held a town hall meeting in Dekalb County, Georgia. You can read a full accounting of the question and answers on Decaturish. I am going to attempt to break down the fact from fiction in his claims.

Administrative Staffing

The first question was;

Davis asked first about a news story that Horton had hired administrative staff rather than teachers at his current district.

Horton said that he had added school counselors and security, not administrative positions, that were district-wide staff because they needed the flexibility to rotate between schools. Horton said that he had also hired an operations manager and people to organize science and technology programs that the district needed but didn’t have.

This is partially true. The District did use COVID-relief (ESSER) funding to hire tutors and counselors, which led to an increase in administrative staffing. However, the District also added additional district-wide headcount. For instance, he hired a Chief of Staff, a position that did not exist prior to 2021 is certainly a district-wide staffer. He also expanded his teacher residency program, which is district-wide and costs almost $1,000,000 per year.

I haven’t seen any evidence to suggest the District has reduced the number of teachers.

Emails to Parents

Next was a question regarding emails sent to parents suggesting they are white supremacists for wanting to return to the classroom.

Davis also asked about a news report that Horton had told a parent that their desire for their child to return to in-person schooling after schools were shut down due to COVID-19 was rooted in white supremacy.   

Horton said that the incident was about a week after the attack on the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and tensions were high. 

This is partially true. Dr. Horton did send a thoughtful apology to the emails.1 However, the emails I have suggest that the apology was sent on January 6, 2021, not a week later. Below is a snapshot of the email header which shows he sent at least one apology on January 6, 2021 at 2:42pm, hours after the capitol was stormed. I believe, his recounting of the timeline is false.

Dr. Horton and the Board did receive a lot of creepy emails, however the Evanston Police Department never took action on anything. My reconstruction of the timeline is;

• January 5, 2021: District 65 sends out an email “Important: Update on Launch of Hybrid Learning Model” which keeps the schools closed for an extended period of time due to COVID.

• January 5, 2021: Parents emailed District 65 to complain, Dr. Horton sent out some combative emails in response.

• January 6, 2021: Dr. Horton emails an apology to some parents.

• January 10, 2021: Board Member alleges that she was the subject of a hate crime. In the allegations, someone vandalized a Christmas card in her car. Cops end up dropping the case. You can read the police report.

• January 11, 2021: District publishes a “Response to Hateful Attacks”2

In other words, it was a pretty crazy time and there was national news coverage on the subject, which made it even more crazy. Since then, I haven’t seen any reports or indications of emails like the ones mentioned.

Before those events, in August of 2020 District 65 went national due to a FOX News Story regarding the return to school plan.3 That story did result in emails I would consider threatening, the District published one of them here. This was a different set of events than what happened in 2021, however.

Improper Contract Awards

This is a story I’ve published and was happy to see someone asking about it;

In response to a question from Decaturish about a report from Evanston, Ill. that Horton’s former business partners received no-bid contracts from District 65 while he was superintendent, Horton said that the company formed with those partners never actually did any business.

Horton said that the organization was originally intended as a 501(c)3 non-profit to do mentoring and coaching for young men in the city, but wound up being filed as an LLC instead. 

This is false. His organization was very clearly not a non-profit organization. You can read the formation documents yourself. I have personally formed both LLC and Non-Profit organizations and will attest that the creation process for both is very different. It is pretty hard to accidentally try to create a non-profit and then stumble into an LLC. He literally signed documents attesting to the creation of an LLC, not a non-profit. Forming a non-profit is a completely different exercise.

Furthermore, no proof has been provided to show the firm did no business. He owns another consulting firm Altering the Education Xperience LLC, which has done business with Chicago Public Schools. You can view a list of the bills here. Something he has not disclosed to the public on his Cook County Statements of Economic Interest. So, it is unclear if this firm is doing business or not.

Furthermore, he cited

“No board policies were violated with regard to bringing those individuals in to do work,” Horton said.

This is false. Section 4:60 of the District 65 Board Manual cites

No purchase or contract shall be made or entered into as a result of favoritism, extravagance, fraud, or corruption. The District shall not participate in the purchase of items, goods, or services that are to become the personal property of individuals.

I cannot think of a more clear example of favoritism in contract awards than giving funds to your former business partners.

Transparency

Regarding transparency;

Horton said that educating parents about how the school district is funded and how the money is spent, along with making sure that decisions are made with input, communication, and clarity, would also improve transparency.

Dr. Horton’s record with transparency is not very good. I’ve documented dozens of cases where he signed contracts over the legal limit of $25,000 and did not provide transparency to the public, in violation of the law (105 ILCS 5/10-20.44) and the state policies. Read them here;

• District Hires Felon for $35,800, doesn’t do background checks or post the contract for the public.

• District steering contracts to business partners over $150,000. Contracts not posted for the public according to the law.

• District pays over $300,000 to former colleague of Dr. Horton for residency program and doesn’t disclose to the public until later.

• District buys software, doesn’t disclose to the public.

In every case, the District has claimed that the omission here was accidental and not intention. They’ve claimed to the ISBE that the process for transparency has improved, however I cannot prove this.

Facilities

Regarding questions about Facilities;

In terms of aging facilities, Horton said there’s an existing master plan for the district, but in general health, life and safety are first priority. The second priority is the building’s roof, windows, and other exterior features, and next is beautifying and improving spaces.                                     

This has been a subject I haven’t written much about, but according to interviews I’ve conducted with teachers, District 65’s facilities have been pretty ignored. For instance, there are ceiling tiles at certain schools that are falling down. I documented cases of the District leaving shipping containers full of toxic mold on properties. One of the challenges here is that District 65 eliminated the head of facilities position and instead has a, “Head of Culture and Climate." This position was awarded to a former colleague of Dr. Horton’s who doesn't have any professional experience working in facilities.4

Teacher Residency Program

Regarding teacher residency programs, he claims;

Horton said that the number of people enrolling in teacher education programs is down, and one solution is teacher residency programs such as the one through the National Center for Teacher Residencies that include a stipend, apprenticing with a master teacher, coursework, and placement with additional support after a year. 

This is a true claim and teacher residencies are, in theory, a great idea. I wrote a lot about the District 65 Teacher Residency program yesterday and the challenges it faced. I’ve come to the conclusion that a residency program makes no sense for a District the size of Evanston, however for DeKalb, it’s not a terrible idea. The fixed costs to run such a program are high, over a million dollars per year, even in the best of circumstances.